linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,sm8250: Add QCS8300 sound card

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a9507045-b900-49ee-8841-0f8fd30816ba@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 09:39:21 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
 Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel@....qualcomm.com, prasad.kumpatla@....qualcomm.com,
 ajay.nandam@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: qcom,sm8250: Add QCS8300 sound
 card

On 10/09/2025 09:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
>> index 8ac91625dce5..eebf80c1d79a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,sm8250.yaml
>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ properties:
>>            - qcom,qcm6490-idp-sndcard
>>            - qcom,qcs6490-rb3gen2-sndcard
>>            - qcom,qcs8275-sndcard
> 
> So what is the point of this compatible? There is no user of it and I
> think you added QCS8275 for this case exactly...
> 
> Shall I start reverting commits from Qualcomm because you post patches
> "just in case" and turns out they are completely not needed? No single
> user of such code?


@Mark,

In case it wasn't obvious, please do not merge the patch till we get
some clarification. For sure it is wrong one way or another: either
incomplete or just duplicated.

Best regards,
Krzysztof