[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250910005957.54108-1-rgbi3307@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 09:59:56 +0900
From: JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@...il.com>
To: cl@...ux.com,
penberg@...nel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
vbabka@...e.cz,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com
Cc: JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rgbi3307@...er.com
Subject: [PATCH] mm/slub: Removing unnecessary variable accesses in the get_freelist()
It pass a NULL pointer to the freelist_new variable
in the __slab_update_freelist() function so that it don't have to re-fetch
the variable values inside the while loop.
Removing unnecessary variable accesses as shown below
will reduce the code size of the get_freelist() function and make it faster.
Signed-off-by: JaeJoon Jung <rgbi3307@...il.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 21 ++++-----------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index d257141896c9..2e305a17a9d7 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3654,27 +3654,14 @@ __update_cpu_freelist_fast(struct kmem_cache *s,
*/
static inline void *get_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
{
- struct slab new;
- unsigned long counters;
- void *freelist;
-
lockdep_assert_held(this_cpu_ptr(&s->cpu_slab->lock));
- do {
- freelist = slab->freelist;
- counters = slab->counters;
-
- new.counters = counters;
-
- new.inuse = slab->objects;
- new.frozen = freelist != NULL;
-
- } while (!__slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
- freelist, counters,
- NULL, new.counters,
+ while (!__slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
+ slab->freelist, slab->counters,
+ NULL, slab->counters,
"get_freelist"));
- return freelist;
+ return slab->freelist;
}
/*
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists