linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 12/20] dt-bindings: perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM dt-bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250910-encouraging-masterful-dodo-3d1f60@kuoka>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 09:57:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Clément Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@...il.com>
Cc: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>, 
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, 
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>, Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>, 
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/20] dt-bindings: perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM
 dt-bindings

On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:12:19PM +0200, Clément Le Goffic wrote:
> From: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
> 
> DDRPERFM is the DDR Performance Monitor embedded in STM32MPU SoC.
> It allows to monitor DDR events that come from the DDR Controller
> such as read or write events.

Also:

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-bindings". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18

Best regards,
Krzysztof