lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <899eb863-6b6d-42f0-9e7c-e2020ee45f4d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:41:41 +0200
From: Clément Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>,
 Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/20] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR props into
 SDRAM props

On 10/09/2025 09:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:12:12PM +0200, Clément Le Goffic wrote:
>> From: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
>>
>> LPDDR and DDR bindings are SDRAM types and are likely to share the same
>> properties (at least for density, io-width and reg).
>> To avoid bindings duplication, factorise the properties.
>>
>> The compatible description has been updated because the MR (Mode
>> registers) used to get manufacturer ID and revision ID are not present
>> in case of DDR.
>> Those information should be in a SPD (Serial Presence Detect) EEPROM in
>> case of DIMM module or are known in case of soldered memory chips as
>> they are in the datasheet of the memory chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@...s.st.com>
> 
> Is this email defunct now, that you add second SoB?

Yes, but I still want to upstream it and was thinking to keep the 
"original" author even if it is me.
Am I wrong here ? What should I do ?

>> Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@...il.com>



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ