lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ldmmd4nh.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:43:14 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Cheng Ming Lin <linchengming884@...il.com>
Cc: richard@....at,  vigneshr@...com,  robh@...nel.org,  krzk+dt@...nel.org,
  conor+dt@...nel.org,  tudor.ambarus@...aro.org,
  mmkurbanov@...utedevices.com,  Takahiro.Kuwano@...ineon.com,
  pratyush@...nel.org,  linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
  devicetree@...r.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
  alvinzhou@...c.com.tw,  Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: spi-nand: macronix: Add randomizer support

On 10/09/2025 at 17:26:13 +08, Cheng Ming Lin <linchengming884@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi Miquel,
>
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> 於 2025年9月10日 週三 下午5:12寫道:
>>
>>
>> > +static int macronix_set_randomizer(struct spinand_device *spinand)
>> > +{
>> > +     struct spi_mem_op exec_op = SPINAND_PROG_EXEC_1S_1S_0_OP(0);
>> > +     struct nand_device *nand = spinand_to_nand(spinand);
>> > +     struct device_node *dn = nanddev_get_of_node(nand);
>> > +     int randopt, ret;
>> > +     u8 cfg, status;
>> > +
>> > +     ret = spinand_read_reg_op(spinand, MACRONIX_FEATURE_ADDR_RANDOMIZER, &cfg);
>> > +     if (ret)
>> > +             return ret;
>> > +     if (cfg)
>> > +             return 0;
>> > +
>> > +     cfg = MACRONIX_CFG_ENPGM | MACRONIX_CFG_RANDEN;
>> > +     randopt = of_property_read_bool(dn, "mxic,randopt");
>>
>> Isn't that a leftover?
>
> The property "mxic,randopt" corresponds to bit2 of the configuration
> register 0x10. Its purpose is to control whether the randomizer also
> covers the initial portion of the spare area.

Do we need a DT property for that?

In any case, it must be declared in the bindings (which I do not think
it is?).

> Since the randomizer feature is only documented in Macronix datasheets,
> it is not clear whether the "randopt" bit is used by all vendors. For
> this reason, the handling is placed inside macronix.c.

Didn't we discuss in the past of a volatile version for SPI NAND
devices? I thought we could use a volatile approach instead.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ