lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <CY8PR12MB719561454E13288C929E5E70DC0EA@CY8PR12MB7195.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:51:08 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Edward Srouji <edwards@...dia.com>
CC: "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>, Vlad
 Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@...dia.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, Gal
 Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function



> From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> Sent: 10 September 2025 01:48 PM
> 
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2025 at 07:08:30PM +0300, Edward Srouji wrote:
> > From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
> >
> > In order to reduce dependencies in IFF_LOOPBACK in route and neighbour
> > resolution steps, squash the static function to its single caller and
> > simplify the code. No functional change.
> 
> It needs more explanation why it is true. 
After second look at the code, it is not true.
It is not true for the case when dev->flags has IFF_LOOPBACK and translate_ip() failed.
In existing code, when translate_ip() fails, code still sets dev_addr->network.
dev_addr->network is not referred if the process_one_req() has error.

> Before this change, we set dev_addr-
> >network to some value and returned error.
> That error propagated upto process_one_req(), which handles only some
> errors and ignores rest.
> 
> So now, we continue to handle REQ without proper req->addr->network.
>
Not exactly. When error is returned by the code addr->network is not filled up, which is correct thing to do.

So at best, commit message should be updated to remove "No functional change".

Will send v1.
 
> Thanks
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Edward Srouji <edwards@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c | 49
> > ++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> > b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c index be0743dac3ff..594e7ee335f7
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
> > @@ -465,34 +465,6 @@ static int addr_resolve_neigh(const struct dst_entry
> *dst,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int copy_src_l2_addr(struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
> > -			    const struct sockaddr *dst_in,
> > -			    const struct dst_entry *dst,
> > -			    const struct net_device *ndev)
> > -{
> > -	int ret = 0;
> > -
> > -	if (dst->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)
> > -		ret = rdma_translate_ip(dst_in, dev_addr);
> > -	else
> > -		rdma_copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst->dev);
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * If there's a gateway and type of device not ARPHRD_INFINIBAND,
> > -	 * we're definitely in RoCE v2 (as RoCE v1 isn't routable) set the
> > -	 * network type accordingly.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (has_gateway(dst, dst_in->sa_family) &&
> > -	    ndev->type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND)
> > -		dev_addr->network = dst_in->sa_family == AF_INET ?
> > -						RDMA_NETWORK_IPV4 :
> > -						RDMA_NETWORK_IPV6;
> > -	else
> > -		dev_addr->network = RDMA_NETWORK_IB;
> > -
> > -	return ret;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
> >  				 unsigned int *ndev_flags,
> >  				 const struct sockaddr *dst_in,
> > @@ -503,6 +475,7 @@ static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct
> rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
> >  	*ndev_flags = ndev->flags;
> >  	/* A physical device must be the RDMA device to use */
> >  	if (ndev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) {
> > +		int ret;
> >  		/*
> >  		 * RDMA (IB/RoCE, iWarp) doesn't run on lo interface or
> >  		 * loopback IP address. So if route is resolved to loopback
> @@
> > -512,9 +485,27 @@ static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr
> *dev_addr,
> >  		ndev = rdma_find_ndev_for_src_ip_rcu(dev_net(ndev),
> dst_in);
> >  		if (IS_ERR(ndev))
> >  			return -ENODEV;
> > +		ret = rdma_translate_ip(dst_in, dev_addr);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +	} else {
> > +		rdma_copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst->dev);
> >  	}
> >
> > -	return copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst_in, dst, ndev);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If there's a gateway and type of device not ARPHRD_INFINIBAND,
> > +	 * we're definitely in RoCE v2 (as RoCE v1 isn't routable) set the
> > +	 * network type accordingly.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (has_gateway(dst, dst_in->sa_family) &&
> > +	    ndev->type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND)
> > +		dev_addr->network = dst_in->sa_family == AF_INET ?
> > +						RDMA_NETWORK_IPV4 :
> > +						RDMA_NETWORK_IPV6;
> > +	else
> > +		dev_addr->network = RDMA_NETWORK_IB;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int set_addr_netns_by_gid_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr *addr)
> > --
> > 2.21.3
> >
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ