lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <719e510e-1032-47cf-9a75-82c36de732f4@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:44:16 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Petre Rodan <petre.rodan@...dimension.ro>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Nuno S?? <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] iio: accel: bma220: reset registers during init
 stage

On 9/11/25 7:36 AM, Petre Rodan wrote:
> 

...

> Just for my curiosity, do reviewers apply the patches one by one to (a branch of)
> the tree itself or do they provide feedback directly based on the diffs?
> 

I think most reviewers are like me and only are looking at the diff in the
email. It would take too much time to apply every single patch I look at. So
I only do that in very rare cases when I have a special interest in a patch.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ