[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87frct9jd0.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:03:39 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
Cc: Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Golle
<daniel@...rotopia.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: core: always verify OOB offset in
mtd_check_oob_ops()
Hello,
>>>> Applied to mtd/next, thanks!
>>>> [1/1] mtd: core: always verify OOB offset in mtd_check_oob_ops()
>>>> commit: bf7d0543b2602be5cb450d8ec5a8710787806f88
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a failure in SPI NOR flashes due to this patch:
>>> (Tested on AM62x SK with S28HS512T OSPI NOR flash)
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
>> Gabor, can you check what happens with mtdblock?
>
> The strange thing is that it works with (SPI) NAND flashes:
>
> # cat /sys/class/mtd/mtd0/type
> nand
> # cat /sys/class/mtd/mtd0/oobavail
> 0
> #
> # hexdump -n 2048 /dev/mtd0
This is not mtdblock, the report was using mtdblock, not mtd directly. I
don't know if that actually makes a difference, but it is worth the try.
Santhosh, please send a revert for now.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists