[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250911144428.GN9224@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:44:28 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: add driver for the eeprom in qnap-mcu
controllers
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2025, 10:41:19 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Lee Jones:
> > On Tue, 09 Sep 2025, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > > On 7/30/25 6:22 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > > The qnap-mcu also has an eeprom connected to it, that contains some
> > > > specific product-information like the mac addresses for the network
> > > > interfaces.
> > > >
> > > > Add a nvmem driver for it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c | 1 +
> > > > drivers/nvmem/Kconfig | 9 +++
> > > > drivers/nvmem/Makefile | 2 +
> > > > drivers/nvmem/qnap-mcu-eeprom.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 4 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 drivers/nvmem/qnap-mcu-eeprom.c
> > > >
> > > In case Lee you want to take this via MFD,
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>
> >
> > Actually this patch should be split up.
> >
> > I'll take the MFD part, you can take the NVMEM part.
>
> (1) the original problem was, that this patch essentially requires
> "mfd: qnap-mcu: Include linux/types.h in qnap-mcu.h shared header" [0]
> to not break builds, hence was "supposed" go into the mfd tree after [0]
> got applied.
>
> But as we're close to -rc6 anyway, we can also just move things after the
> next merge-window if that is better.
>
> (2) For the splitting part, just to make sure I understand correctly, you'd
> like the part of
>
> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ static const struct qnap_mcu_variant qnap_ts433_mcu = {
> };
>
> static struct mfd_cell qnap_mcu_cells[] = {
> + { .name = "qnap-mcu-eeprom", },
> { .name = "qnap-mcu-input", },
> { .name = "qnap-mcu-leds", },
> { .name = "qnap-mcu-hwmon", }
>
> to be its own patch for the mfd subsystem?
Correct.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists