linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Add i.MX91 platform support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aMI1ljdUkC3qxGU9@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 22:36:06 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Joy Zou <joy.zou@....com>,
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	festevam@...il.com, richardcochran@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
	frieder.schrempf@...tron.de, primoz.fiser@...ik.com,
	othacehe@....org, Markus.Niebel@...tq-group.com,
	alexander.stein@...tq-group.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...tq-group.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Add i.MX91 platform support

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:30:20AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 11:40:17PM +0000, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
> > by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
>
> Jakub,
>
> Can you stop applying DTS changes via net tree?

shawn:
	Suppose Jaku only pick patch 6.

        - [v10,6/6] net: stmmac: imx: add i.MX91 support
          https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/59aec9138f30

other patches is "(no matching commit)"

Frank

>
> Shawn
>
> > On Mon,  1 Sep 2025 18:36:26 +0800 you wrote:
> > > The design of i.MX91 platform is very similar to i.MX93.
> > > Extracts the common parts in order to reuse code.
> > >
> > > The mainly difference between i.MX91 and i.MX93 is as follows:
> > > - i.MX91 removed some clocks and modified the names of some clocks.
> > > - i.MX91 only has one A core.
> > > - i.MX91 has different pinmux.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Here is the summary with links:
> >   - [v10,1/6] arm64: dts: freescale: move aliases from imx93.dtsi to board dts
> >     (no matching commit)
> >   - [v10,2/6] arm64: dts: freescale: rename imx93.dtsi to imx91_93_common.dtsi and modify them
> >     (no matching commit)
> >   - [v10,3/6] arm64: dts: imx91: add i.MX91 dtsi support
> >     (no matching commit)
> >   - [v10,4/6] arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX91 11x11 EVK basic support
> >     (no matching commit)
> >   - [v10,5/6] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: remove fec property eee-broken-1000t
> >     (no matching commit)
> >   - [v10,6/6] net: stmmac: imx: add i.MX91 support
> >     https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/59aec9138f30
> >
> > You are awesome, thank you!
> > --
> > Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
> > https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
> >
> >
>