linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 13/29] arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250911162956.00005157@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:29:56 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, D Scott Phillips OS
	<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
	<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
	<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
	<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, Koba
 Ko <kobak@...dia.com>, Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
	<fenghuay@...dia.com>, <baisheng.gao@...soc.com>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>, Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>, "Rafael Wysocki"
	<rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi
	<lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Sudeep Holla
	<sudeep.holla@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, "Will
 Deacon" <will@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/29] arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl
 supports

On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:42:53 +0000
James Morse <james.morse@....com> wrote:

> Expand the probing support with the control and monitor types
> we can use with resctrl.
> 
> CC: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>

A few trivial things inline.
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Out of time for today, fingers crossed I can get to the others tomorrow.

J
>  static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  {
>  	u64 idr;
> @@ -592,6 +736,7 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  	mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>  	idr = mpam_msc_read_idr(msc);
>  	mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> +
Stray change  - push it to earlier patch.

>  	msc->ris_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_RIS_MAX, idr);
>  
>  	/* Use these values so partid/pmg always starts with a valid value */
> @@ -614,6 +759,12 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  		mutex_unlock(&mpam_list_lock);
>  		if (IS_ERR(ris))
>  			return PTR_ERR(ris);
> +		ris->idr = idr;
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> +		__mpam_part_sel(ris_idx, 0, msc);
> +		mpam_ris_hw_probe(ris);
> +		mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_lock(&partid_max_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> index 4cc44d4e21c4..5ae5d4eee8ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> @@ -112,6 +112,55 @@ static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&msc->_mon_sel_lock);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * When we compact the supported features, we don't care what they are.
> + * Storing them as a bitmap makes life easy.
> + */
> +typedef u16 mpam_features_t;

Maybe use a bitmap type and avoid the need to be careful on sizing etc?

> +
> +/* Bits for mpam_features_t */
> +enum mpam_device_features {
> +	mpam_feat_ccap_part = 0,
> +	mpam_feat_cpor_part,
> +	mpam_feat_mbw_part,
> +	mpam_feat_mbw_min,
> +	mpam_feat_mbw_max,
> +	mpam_feat_mbw_prop,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_capture,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_capture,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_capt,
> +	MPAM_FEATURE_LAST,

If it's always meant to be LAST, I'd drop the trailing comma.

> +};
> +static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(mpam_features_t) >= MPAM_FEATURE_LAST);