| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ee9d1e0b-1583-4fd0-9598-753219957df1@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 12:48:23 -0500
From: "Bowman, Terry" <terry.bowman@....com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: dave@...olabs.net, dave.jiang@...el.com, alison.schofield@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
ming.li@...omail.com, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com,
rrichter@....com, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com, lukas@...ner.de,
Benjamin.Cheatham@....com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, alucerop@....com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/23] cxl: Move CXL driver RCH error handling into
CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS conditional block
On 8/29/2025 10:33 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 20:35:20 -0500
> Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com> wrote:
>
>> Restricted CXL Host (RCH) protocol error handling uses a procedure distinct
>> from the CXL Virtual Hierarchy (VH) handling. This is because of the
>> differences in the RCH and VH topologies. Improve the maintainability and
>> add ability to enable/disable RCH handling.
>>
>> Move and combine the RCH handling code into a single block conditionally
>> compiled with the CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS kernel config.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
>>
> How painful to move this to a ras_rch.c file and conditionally compile that?
>
> Would want to do that is some merged thing with patch 1 though, rather than
> moving at least some of the code twice.
>
I don't see an issue and the effort would be a simple rework of patch1 as you
mentioned. But, it would drop the 'reviewed-by' sign-offs. Should we check with
others about this too?
Terry
>
>> ---
>> v10->v11:
>> - New patch
>> ---
>> drivers/cxl/core/ras.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> index 0875ce8116ff..f42f9a255ef8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras.c
>> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ void cxl_ras_exit(void)
>> cancel_work_sync(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CXL_RCH_RAS
>> static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> {
>> resource_size_t aer_phys;
>> @@ -141,18 +142,6 @@ static void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> -{
>> - struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
>> - struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
>> -
>> - if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
>> - dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
>> - else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
>> - BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
>> - dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
>> -}
>> -
>> static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> {
>> void __iomem *aer_base = dport->regs.dport_aer;
>> @@ -177,6 +166,95 @@ static void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> writel(aer_cmd, aer_base + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
>> + * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
>> + * status after copying.
>> + *
>> + * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
>> + * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
>> + */
>> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
>> + struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
>> +{
>> + int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
>> + u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
>> + int n;
>> +
>> + if (!aer_base)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
>> + for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
>> + aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
>> +
>> + writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
>> + writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
>> +static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
>> + int *severity)
>> +{
>> + if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
>> + if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
>> + *severity = AER_FATAL;
>> + else
>> + *severity = AER_NONFATAL;
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
>> + *severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
>> + struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
>> + struct cxl_dport *dport;
>> + int severity;
>> +
>> + struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
>> + cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
>> + if (!port)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
>> + if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
>> + cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
>> + else
>> + cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline void cxl_dport_map_rch_aer(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
>> +static inline void cxl_disable_rch_root_ints(struct cxl_dport *dport) { }
>> +static inline void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) { }
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static void cxl_dport_map_ras(struct cxl_dport *dport)
>> +{
>> + struct cxl_register_map *map = &dport->reg_map;
>> + struct device *dev = dport->dport_dev;
>> +
>> + if (!map->component_map.ras.valid)
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "RAS registers not found\n");
>> + else if (cxl_map_component_regs(map, &dport->regs.component,
>> + BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)))
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n");
>> +}
>>
>> /**
>> * cxl_dport_init_ras_reporting - Setup CXL RAS report on this dport
>> @@ -270,79 +348,6 @@ static bool cxl_handle_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, void __iomem *ras_base)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Copy the AER capability registers using 32 bit read accesses.
>> - * This is necessary because RCRB AER capability is MMIO mapped. Clear the
>> - * status after copying.
>> - *
>> - * @aer_base: base address of AER capability block in RCRB
>> - * @aer_regs: destination for copying AER capability
>> - */
>> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_info(void __iomem *aer_base,
>> - struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs)
>> -{
>> - int read_cnt = sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs) / sizeof(u32);
>> - u32 *aer_regs_buf = (u32 *)aer_regs;
>> - int n;
>> -
>> - if (!aer_base)
>> - return false;
>> -
>> - /* Use readl() to guarantee 32-bit accesses */
>> - for (n = 0; n < read_cnt; n++)
>> - aer_regs_buf[n] = readl(aer_base + n * sizeof(u32));
>> -
>> - writel(aer_regs->uncor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS);
>> - writel(aer_regs->cor_status, aer_base + PCI_ERR_COR_STATUS);
>> -
>> - return true;
>> -}
>> -
>> -/* Get AER severity. Return false if there is no error. */
>> -static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
>> - int *severity)
>> -{
>> - if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
>> - if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
>> - *severity = AER_FATAL;
>> - else
>> - *severity = AER_NONFATAL;
>> - return true;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (aer_regs->cor_status & ~aer_regs->cor_mask) {
>> - *severity = AER_CORRECTABLE;
>> - return true;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return false;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static void cxl_handle_rdport_errors(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
>> -{
>> - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(cxlds->dev);
>> - struct aer_capability_regs aer_regs;
>> - struct cxl_dport *dport;
>> - int severity;
>> -
>> - struct cxl_port *port __free(put_cxl_port) =
>> - cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
>> - if (!port)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_info(dport->regs.dport_aer, &aer_regs))
>> - return;
>> -
>> - if (!cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(&aer_regs, &severity))
>> - return;
>> -
>> - pci_print_aer(pdev, severity, &aer_regs);
>> - if (severity == AER_CORRECTABLE)
>> - cxl_handle_cor_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
>> - else
>> - cxl_handle_ras(cxlds, dport->regs.ras);
>> -}
>> -
>> void cxl_cor_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists