[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMJurorR5MfCcVQV@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:39:42 +0300
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Martin Hecht <mhecht73@...il.com>
Cc: michael.roeder@...et.eu, martin.hecht@...et.eu,
Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: i2c: alvium: Accelerated alvium_set_power
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 07:17:01PM +0200, Martin Hecht wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> thank you for your feedback. Please ignore v3 because overlap. I will adopt
> your proposal and send v4. Nevertheless I'm in conversation with Ricardo
> because some eventually misleading feedback from CI to learn how to deal
> with that.
Ack.
> > return ret ?: brcm_major ? 0 : -ENODEV;
Actually -ETIMEDOUT is probably a better choice than -ENODEV in this case.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists