linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: MHDP8546 bridge binding changes for DSC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3e7e640a-88b0-496b-9ba3-53a36f31be80@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 09:12:57 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Harikrishna Shenoy <h-shenoy@...com>
Cc: andrzej.hajda@...el.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
 Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
 jernej.skrabec@...il.com, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 sjakhade@...ence.com, yamonkar@...ence.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devarsht@...com,
 u-kumar1@...com, s-jain1@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: MHDP8546 bridge binding
 changes for DSC

On 10/09/2025 10:12, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
> 
> On 9/10/25 13:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 11:16:22AM +0530, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
>>> From: Swapnil Jakhade <sjakhade@...ence.com>
>>>
>>> Add binding changes for DSC(Display Stream Compression) in the MHDP8546
>>> DPI/DP bridge.
>> Also, where is any user of this change (DSC)? Why are you adding changes
>> to the bindings which no one uses?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> Cadence MHDP has DSC IP which can be enabled, DT will need to define DSC 
> register space
> 
> for using the feature, was planning to  post DT and driver changes once 
> bindings get accepted.

No, this is not how it works. Read the docs... recently TI dropped the
ball and you really send crappy patches.

You post always bindings and users, in this case with driver.

To be clear for this patch alone:

NAK


Best regards,
Krzysztof