lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wetzewmbraeawwintmxqntjhvennq5iu2jeegel3glk7y6rsnf@4vwscm5bwezr>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:52:13 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, 
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, 
	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] phy: qcom: edp: Add Glymur platform support

On 25-09-09 14:12:46, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 01:07:28PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > The Qualcomm Glymur platform has the new v8 version
> > of the eDP/DP PHY. So rework the driver to support this
> > new version and add the platform specific configuration data.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 242 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 235 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > index ca9bb9d70e29e1a132bd499fb9f74b5837acf45b..b670cda0fa066d3ff45c66b73cc67e165e55b79a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
> > @@ -26,13 +26,15 @@
> >  #include "phy-qcom-qmp-qserdes-com-v4.h"
> >  #include "phy-qcom-qmp-qserdes-com-v6.h"
> >  
> > +#include "phy-qcom-qmp-dp-qserdes-com-v8.h"
> > +
> >  /* EDP_PHY registers */
> >  #define DP_PHY_CFG                              0x0010
> >  #define DP_PHY_CFG_1                            0x0014
> >  #define DP_PHY_PD_CTL                           0x001c
> >  #define DP_PHY_MODE                             0x0020
> >  
> > -#define DP_AUX_CFG_SIZE                         10
> > +#define DP_AUX_CFG_SIZE                         13
> 
> If it differs from platform to platform, do we need to continue defining
> it?
> 
> Also, if the AUX CFG size has increased, didn't it cause other registers
> to shift too?

AFAICT, all platforms have AUX_CFG0 through AUX_CFG12, we just didn't
need to write anything to the last two so far.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ