[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250911104222.GY3289052@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 12:42:22 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@...edance.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Florian Bezdeka <florian.bezdeka@...mens.com>,
Songtang Liu <liusongtang@...edance.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Matteo Martelli <matteo.martelli@...ethink.co.uk>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Task based throttle follow ups
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 05:50:40PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Aaron Lu (4):
> sched/fair: Propagate load for throttled cfs_rq
> sched/fair: update_cfs_group() for throttled cfs_rqs
> sched/fair: Do not special case tasks in throttled hierarchy
I stuffed these first 3 into queue/sched/core, leaving this one:
> sched/fair: Do not balance task to a throttled cfs_rq
on the table, because the robot already hated on it.
If anybody disagrees with one of the queued patches, holler and I'll
make it go away. Otherwise they should show up in tip 'soonish'.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists