lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <uuiuvshiofi23es4rr6mzjdruagua34la7vfsw3qo6ozwgs7vj@bskm4epl4twu>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 12:45:42 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/19] tools/docs: python_version: move version check
 from sphinx-pre-install

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 01:28:28PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2025, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Em Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:14:33 +0300
> > Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> escreveu:
> >
> >> On Thu, 04 Sep 2025, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> >> > +        # Restart script using the newer version  
> >> 
> >> I thought the whole idea of restarting was completely rejected by
> >> approximately everyone?!
> >
> > This patch is just moving the code. There is a patch after this one
> > changing the behavior.
> 
> Shouldn't we fix that kind of problems first, instead of refactoring?

The patch order doesn't matter, provided that it won't break bisect.

-- 
Thanks,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ