linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] drvier: usb: dwc3: Fix runtime PM trying to activate child device xxx.dwc3 but parent is not active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gT26VK-sHmgK_S4RjjO3Uc-ZmoAYos43S5yWh0zWc9DA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:35:59 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, Ryan Zhou <ryanzhou54@...il.com>, 
	"stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, 
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	"royluo@...gle.com" <royluo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drvier: usb: dwc3: Fix runtime PM trying to activate
 child device xxx.dwc3 but parent is not active

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 12:58 PM Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ryan,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 01:32:47AM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025, Ryan Zhou wrote:
> > > Issue description:During the wake-up sequence, if the system invokes
> > >  dwc3->resume and detects that the parent device of dwc3 is in a
> > > runtime suspend state, the system will generate an error: runtime PM
> > > trying to activate child device xxx.dwc3 but parent is not active.
> > >
> > > Solution:At the dwc3->resume entry point, if the dwc3 controller
> > > is detected in a suspended state, the function shall return
> > > immediately without executing any further operations.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Zhou <ryanzhou54@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > index 370fc524a468..06a6f8a67129 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > @@ -2687,6 +2687,9 @@ int dwc3_pm_resume(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> > >     struct device *dev = dwc->dev;
> > >     int             ret = 0;
> > >
> > > +   if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
> > > +           return ret;
> > > +
> >
> > Is this a documented behavior where the device should remain runtime
> > suspend on system resume? I feel that that this should be configurable
> > by the user or defined the PM core. I don't think we should change
> > default behavior here just to workaround the issue that we're facing.
> >
> > What if the user wants to keep the old behavior and resume up the device
> > on system resume?
>
> What about resume the device firstly if it's already runtime suspended when
> call dwc3_pm_suspend(). Therefor, the old behavior can be kept and the issue
> can be avoided.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index 370fc524a468..1b8dbb260017 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -2672,6 +2672,9 @@ int dwc3_pm_suspend(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>         struct device *dev = dwc->dev;
>         int             ret;
>
> +       if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
> +               pm_runtime_resume(dev);

You can just call pm_runtime_resume() here without the preliminary check.

> +
>         ret = dwc3_suspend_common(dwc, PMSG_SUSPEND);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> Thanks,
> Xu Yang
>
> >
> > BR,
> > Thinh
> >
> > >     pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
> > >
> > >     pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > > --