[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5044667.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:04:53 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
"Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: ACPI: Use on_each_cpu_mask() in drv_write()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Make drv_write() call on_each_cpu_mask() instead of using an open-coded
equivalent of the latter.
Also remove a comment mentioning the smp_call_function_many() usage
which is not particularly useful anyway.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@...nel.org>
---
v1 -> v2:
* Drop a comment mentioning smp_call_function_many() usage (Mario)
* Update changelog
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -318,7 +318,6 @@ static u32 drv_read(struct acpi_cpufreq_
return cmd.val;
}
-/* Called via smp_call_function_many(), on the target CPUs */
static void do_drv_write(void *_cmd)
{
struct drv_cmd *cmd = _cmd;
@@ -335,14 +334,8 @@ static void drv_write(struct acpi_cpufre
.val = val,
.func.write = data->cpu_freq_write,
};
- int this_cpu;
- this_cpu = get_cpu();
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
- do_drv_write(&cmd);
-
- smp_call_function_many(mask, do_drv_write, &cmd, 1);
- put_cpu();
+ on_each_cpu_mask(mask, do_drv_write, &cmd, true);
}
static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists