[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025091233-showman-dill-3d17@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:45:58 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Akiyoshi Kurita <weibu@...admin.org>
Cc: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: fix coding style in hal_com_phycfg.c
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:46:41PM +0900, Akiyoshi Kurita wrote:
> The function definition for phy_StoreTxPowerByRateBase() did not
> follow the kernel coding style.
>
> Move the closing parenthesis to the same line as the argument to fix
> the style issue reported by checkpatch.pl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akiyoshi Kurita <weibu@...admin.org>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c
> index d5649e7d8f99..f137ec747ab3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/hal_com_phycfg.c
> @@ -60,9 +60,7 @@ phy_SetTxPowerByRateBase(struct adapter *Adapter, u8 RfPath,
> }
>
> static void
> -phy_StoreTxPowerByRateBase(
> -struct adapter *padapter
> - )
> +phy_StoreTxPowerByRateBase(struct adapter *padapter)
This really should end up being:
static void phy_StoreTxPowerByRateBase(struct adapter *padapter)
right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists