[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250912143115.GB51602@gnbcxd0016.gnb.st.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:31:15 +0200
From: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>
To: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>
CC: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Patrice Chotard
<patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof
Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/sti: make use of drm_of_component_probe
Hello Raphael,
Thanks for this patch.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:15:33PM +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
> Enhance the probing sequence by using the ports property of the
> display-subsystem node.
>
> That done, it becomes possible to handle the display-substem node
> outside of the soc node within the device-tree and not have each IP
> blocks as children of the display-subsystem node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 13 +------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
> index 42f21ab91957b38cb9aef012b6ee7f4ae1683edf..9d6a7c8fa0759c0b6fedf87169b18cff3684be46 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c
> @@ -231,9 +231,6 @@ static const struct component_master_ops sti_ops = {
> static int sti_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> - struct device_node *child_np;
> - struct component_match *match = NULL;
> int ret;
>
> ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> @@ -242,15 +239,7 @@ static int sti_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>
> - child_np = of_get_next_available_child(node, NULL);
> -
> - while (child_np) {
> - drm_of_component_match_add(dev, &match, component_compare_of,
> - child_np);
> - child_np = of_get_next_available_child(node, child_np);
> - }
> -
> - return component_master_add_with_match(dev, &sti_ops, match);
> + return drm_of_component_probe(dev, component_compare_of, &sti_ops);
> }
>
> static void sti_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> --
> 2.50.1
>
Acked-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>
Best regards
Alain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists