linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] dpll: fix clock quality level reporting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6c98a19e-473a-4935-a3aa-51c53618b2a9@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:37:55 +0100
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
 Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dpll: fix clock quality level reporting

On 12.09.2025 10:33, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> The DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_ITU_OPT1_EPRC is not reported via netlink
> due to bug in dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(). The usage of
> DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX for both DECLARE_BITMAP() and
> for_each_set_bit() is not correct because these macros requires bitmap
> size and not the highest valid bit in the bitmap.
> 
> Use correct bitmap size to fix this issue.
> 
> Fixes: a1afb959add1 ("dpll: add clock quality level attribute and op")
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
> ---
>   drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> index 036f21cac0a9..0a852011653c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> @@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static int
>   dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>   				 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>   {
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(qls, DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX + 1) = { 0 };
>   	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
> -	DECLARE_BITMAP(qls, DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX) = { 0 };

I believe __DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX should be used in both places

>   	enum dpll_clock_quality_level ql;
>   	int ret;
>   
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ dpll_msg_add_clock_quality_level(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>   	ret = ops->clock_quality_level_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll), qls, extack);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
> -	for_each_set_bit(ql, qls, DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX)
> +	for_each_set_bit(ql, qls, DPLL_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL_MAX + 1)
>   		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_CLOCK_QUALITY_LEVEL, ql))
>   			return -EMSGSIZE;
>