linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10.y] cpufreq: scmi: Fix null-ptr-deref in scmi_cpufreq_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b6ebf19c-8328-44de-a695-157061a9d8a8@omp.ru>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 23:35:07 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: <stable@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, Sudeep Holla
	<sudeep.holla@....com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	<lvc-project@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10.y] cpufreq: scmi: Fix null-ptr-deref in
 scmi_cpufreq_get_rate()

From: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 484d3f15cc6cbaa52541d6259778e715b2c83c54 ]

cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() can return NULL when the target CPU is not present
in the policy->cpus mask. scmi_cpufreq_get_rate() does not check for
this case, which results in a NULL pointer dereference.

Add NULL check after cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() to prevent this issue.

[Sergey: resolved reject (reordering the local variables).]

Fixes: 99d6bdf33877 ("cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol")
Signed-off-by: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>

---
 drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-stable/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-stable.orig/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ linux-stable/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -29,12 +29,18 @@ static const struct scmi_handle *handle;
 
 static unsigned int scmi_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
 	const struct scmi_perf_ops *perf_ops = handle->perf_ops;
-	struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+	struct scmi_data *priv;
 	unsigned long rate;
 	int ret;
 
+	policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
+	if (unlikely(!policy))
+		return 0;
+
+	priv = policy->driver_data;
+
 	ret = perf_ops->freq_get(handle, priv->domain_id, &rate, false);
 	if (ret)
 		return 0;