linux-kernel - [PATCH v15 01/41] KVM: SEV: Rename kvm_ghcb_get_sw_exit_code() to kvm_get_cached_sw_exit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250912232319.429659-2-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:22:39 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...ecurity.net>, 
	John Allen <john.allen@....com>, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, 
	Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, 
	Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, Zhang Yi Z <yi.z.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 01/41] KVM: SEV: Rename kvm_ghcb_get_sw_exit_code() to kvm_get_cached_sw_exit_code()

Rename kvm_ghcb_get_sw_exit_code() to kvm_get_cached_sw_exit_code() to make
it clear that KVM is getting the cached value, not reading directly from
the guest-controlled GHCB.  More importantly, vacating
kvm_ghcb_get_sw_exit_code() will allow adding a KVM-specific macro-built
kvm_ghcb_get_##field() helper to read values from the GHCB.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 2fdd2e478a97..fe8d148b76c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -3216,7 +3216,7 @@ void sev_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		kvfree(svm->sev_es.ghcb_sa);
 }
 
-static u64 kvm_ghcb_get_sw_exit_code(struct vmcb_control_area *control)
+static u64 kvm_get_cached_sw_exit_code(struct vmcb_control_area *control)
 {
 	return (((u64)control->exit_code_hi) << 32) | control->exit_code;
 }
@@ -3242,7 +3242,7 @@ static void dump_ghcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	 */
 	pr_err("GHCB (GPA=%016llx) snapshot:\n", svm->vmcb->control.ghcb_gpa);
 	pr_err("%-20s%016llx is_valid: %u\n", "sw_exit_code",
-	       kvm_ghcb_get_sw_exit_code(control), kvm_ghcb_sw_exit_code_is_valid(svm));
+	       kvm_get_cached_sw_exit_code(control), kvm_ghcb_sw_exit_code_is_valid(svm));
 	pr_err("%-20s%016llx is_valid: %u\n", "sw_exit_info_1",
 	       control->exit_info_1, kvm_ghcb_sw_exit_info_1_is_valid(svm));
 	pr_err("%-20s%016llx is_valid: %u\n", "sw_exit_info_2",
@@ -3331,7 +3331,7 @@ static int sev_es_validate_vmgexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	 * Retrieve the exit code now even though it may not be marked valid
 	 * as it could help with debugging.
 	 */
-	exit_code = kvm_ghcb_get_sw_exit_code(control);
+	exit_code = kvm_get_cached_sw_exit_code(control);
 
 	/* Only GHCB Usage code 0 is supported */
 	if (svm->sev_es.ghcb->ghcb_usage) {
@@ -4336,7 +4336,7 @@ int sev_handle_vmgexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	svm_vmgexit_success(svm, 0);
 
-	exit_code = kvm_ghcb_get_sw_exit_code(control);
+	exit_code = kvm_get_cached_sw_exit_code(control);
 	switch (exit_code) {
 	case SVM_VMGEXIT_MMIO_READ:
 		ret = setup_vmgexit_scratch(svm, true, control->exit_info_2);
-- 
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog