[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250912232319.429659-37-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:23:14 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...ecurity.net>,
John Allen <john.allen@....com>, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, Zhang Yi Z <yi.z.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 36/41] KVM: selftests: Add support for MSR_IA32_{S,U}_CET
to MSRs test
Extend the MSRs test to support {S,U}_CET, which are a bit of a pain to
handled due to the MSRs existing if IBT *or* SHSTK is supported. To deal
with Intel's wonderful decision to bundle IBT and SHSTK under CET, track
the "second" feature and skip RDMSR #GP tests to avoid false failures when
running on a CPU with only one of IBT or SHSTK.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/msrs_test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/msrs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/msrs_test.c
index dcb429cf1440..095d49d07235 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/msrs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/msrs_test.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
struct kvm_msr {
const struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature feature;
+ const struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature feature2;
const char *name;
const u64 reset_val;
const u64 write_val;
@@ -18,7 +19,7 @@ struct kvm_msr {
const u32 index;
};
-#define __MSR_TEST(msr, str, val, rsvd, reset, feat) \
+#define ____MSR_TEST(msr, str, val, rsvd, reset, feat, f2) \
{ \
.index = msr, \
.name = str, \
@@ -26,14 +27,21 @@ struct kvm_msr {
.rsvd_val = rsvd, \
.reset_val = reset, \
.feature = X86_FEATURE_ ##feat, \
+ .feature2 = X86_FEATURE_ ##f2, \
}
+#define __MSR_TEST(msr, str, val, rsvd, reset, feat) \
+ ____MSR_TEST(msr, str, val, rsvd, reset, feat, feat)
+
#define MSR_TEST_NON_ZERO(msr, val, rsvd, reset, feat) \
__MSR_TEST(msr, #msr, val, rsvd, reset, feat)
#define MSR_TEST(msr, val, rsvd, feat) \
__MSR_TEST(msr, #msr, val, rsvd, 0, feat)
+#define MSR_TEST2(msr, val, rsvd, feat, f2) \
+ ____MSR_TEST(msr, #msr, val, rsvd, 0, feat, f2)
+
/*
* Note, use a page aligned value for the canonical value so that the value
* is compatible with MSRs that use bits 11:0 for things other than addresses.
@@ -98,10 +106,18 @@ static void guest_test_unsupported_msr(const struct kvm_msr *msr)
u64 val;
u8 vec;
+ /*
+ * Skip the RDMSR #GP test if the secondary feature is supported, as
+ * only the to-be-written value depends on the primary feature.
+ */
+ if (this_cpu_has(msr->feature2))
+ goto skip_rdmsr_gp;
+
vec = rdmsr_safe(msr->index, &val);
__GUEST_ASSERT(vec == GP_VECTOR, "Wanted #GP on RDMSR(0x%x), got %s",
msr->index, ex_str(vec));
+skip_rdmsr_gp:
vec = wrmsr_safe(msr->index, msr->write_val);
__GUEST_ASSERT(vec == GP_VECTOR, "Wanted #GP on WRMSR(0x%x, 0x%lx), got %s",
msr->index, msr->write_val, ex_str(vec));
@@ -224,6 +240,10 @@ static void test_msrs(void)
MSR_TEST_CANONICAL(MSR_CSTAR, LM),
MSR_TEST(MSR_SYSCALL_MASK, 0xffffffff, 0, LM),
+ MSR_TEST2(MSR_IA32_S_CET, CET_SHSTK_EN, CET_RESERVED, SHSTK, IBT),
+ MSR_TEST2(MSR_IA32_S_CET, CET_ENDBR_EN, CET_RESERVED, IBT, SHSTK),
+ MSR_TEST2(MSR_IA32_U_CET, CET_SHSTK_EN, CET_RESERVED, SHSTK, IBT),
+ MSR_TEST2(MSR_IA32_U_CET, CET_ENDBR_EN, CET_RESERVED, IBT, SHSTK),
MSR_TEST_CANONICAL(MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP, SHSTK),
MSR_TEST(MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP, canonical_val, canonical_val | 1, SHSTK),
MSR_TEST_CANONICAL(MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP, SHSTK),
--
2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists