[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b89eda12-c930-43e8-92c0-c2e1699284f7@web.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:00:07 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>, Tamas Zsoldos <tamas.zsoldos@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: trbe: Use scope-based resource management in
arm_trbe_alloc_buffer()
>> Scope-based resource management became supported for some
>> programming interfaces by contributions of Peter Zijlstra on 2023-05-26.
>> See also the commit 54da6a0924311c7cf5015533991e44fb8eb12773 ("locking:
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> SHA ID here just needs first 12 digits not the entire string.
See also once more:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17-rc5#n109
>> Introduce __cleanup() based infrastructure").
>>
>> * Thus use the attribute “__free(kfree)”.
>>
>> * Reduce the scopes for the local variables “buf” and “pglist”.
>
> What is that required ?
The needed variables should be defined in a succinct way.
>> * Omit four kfree() calls accordingly.
>
> Right.
>
> The commit message should be re-written with little more
> context from arm_trbe_alloc_buffer(), after describing
> the new scope-based resource management.
Which background information do you miss so far?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists