linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] mtd: ubi: skip programming unused bits in ubi headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <579487457.27484.1757664285819.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 10:04:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Cheng Ming Lin <linchengming884@...il.com>
Cc: chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>, 
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, 
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, 
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Alvin Zhou <alvinzhou@...c.com.tw>, leoyu <leoyu@...c.com.tw>, 
	Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: ubi: skip programming unused bits in ubi headers

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Cheng Ming Lin" <linchengming884@...il.com>
>> Thanks for the detailed answer!
>> So, yes let's apply this change.
> 
> Sorry, I need to adjust the code a bit, since I just noticed my
> condition on vid_hdr shift was incorrect. I will send a v2 version.

I expected anyway that you'll send a non-RFC version of the patch. :)
Just in case, you ran ubi tests with various different nands?
nandsim can help.
Especially with and without subpage support.

Thanks,
//richard