linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490: Introduce Radxa Dragon Q6A

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0b703f90-fd42-41c4-86ec-bbeb71553127@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 10:53:54 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Xilin Wu <sophon@...xa.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>,
 Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490: Introduce Radxa Dragon
 Q6A

On 12/09/2025 10:25, Xilin Wu wrote:
> On 2025/9/12 16:12:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/09/2025 10:03, Xilin Wu wrote:
>>> base-commit: 51095600e8c19d53729a7fbd273abc4435a25e9b
>>> change-id: 20250912-radxa-dragon-q6a-eedcdeaf3e66
>>> prerequisite-message-id: <20250902164900.21685-1-quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 257564b609217fda19c9f3424fcd9f6e2ce3ef3c
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: a8f21781f3bff140260100b74041752000c06000
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: b46127e2433ede17cc5e1a012f58041c6ef97b13
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: e8978c5a30373c3ff312b2c8720f586c389f18f8
>>> prerequisite-message-id: <20250911043256.3523057-1-viken.dadhaniya@....qualcomm.com>
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: c7a057030b78afbbb231280de3765294c006c6f8
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 56011305aa35e4c64fc7d63950764807cb81cc4d
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: c3d3b313ac6abe4ec10fd820b6a9bbc63fdbdb82
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 63ee94d0ccd40f60a98b0004d627ad2e7b440d25
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 392e8f1902571e5035d5af72e40dc474b5f1b274
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: e38fba722bdabc02ba09d2dc51df7010dbe28168
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: a3ca5dba8def5769ffb4b95df2963da60a736f96
>>> prerequisite-patch-id: 4c0fe8d677d73aaf1b5b842e072246d84729d1c4
>> So the RFC is because it cannot be yet merged? Please always add such
>> note in the cover letter.
>>
>> Also, are you sure these are real dependencies? Like REALLY real
>> dependencies?
> 
> Well, I think these are indeed dependencies. The dtb does build without 
> them, but dtbs_check will fail. The board will also malfunction or 


That's not a dependency.

> simple crash on boot without the DT and driver changes.

Neither is this.


> 
> 


Best regards,
Krzysztof