lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <OS8PR06MB7541C0D6696FC754D944D45EF208A@OS8PR06MB7541.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:27:51 +0000
From: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>, "benh@...nel.crashing.org"
	<benh@...nel.crashing.org>, "joel@....id.au" <joel@....id.au>,
	"andi.shyti@...nel.org" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org"
	<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "andrew@...econstruct.com.au"
	<andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, "p.zabel@...gutronix.de"
	<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
	<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, "naresh.solanki@...ements.com"
	<naresh.solanki@...ements.com>, "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, "openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org"
	<openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org"
	<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v18 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed,i2c.yaml: add
 transfer-mode and global-regs properties and update example

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed,i2c.yaml: add
> transfer-mode and global-regs properties and update example
> 
> Hi Ryan,
> 
> > And AST2600 i2c controller have two register mode, one is legacy
> > register layout which is mix controller/target register control
> > together, another is new mode which is separate controller/target
> > register control.
> 
> OK, but the ast2400 and ast2500 I2C peripherals - which this binding also
> describes - do not have that facility. Given the 2600 is a distinct peripheral (as
> discussed on the v16 series), this would seem to warrant a distinct binding.
> 
> Should this be split out into an ast2600-specific binding, to reflect that it is
> different hardware? The reference to the global registers and transfer modes
> would then be added only to the ast2600-i2c-bus binding.

I agree it would be cleaner to split out a new binding file specifically for AST2600,
for example: `aspeed,ast2600-i2c.yaml`
But also I think `aspeed,i2cv2.yaml` more better name, that compatible will 
support next generation such like AST2700 .....

If this is ok, I'll proceed to refactor the bindings accordingly in the next version.

Ryan

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Jeremy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ