| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMgjq7BbYmTCmA+NPS_jQ3iWM4DJR1mkDe925qTcYOMzbGwnGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 17:42:53 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/15] mm, swap: use the swap table for the swap cache
and switch API
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 5:31 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:54:19AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2025/9/11 10:48, Kairui Song wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:34 AM Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:27 AM Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Kairui,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm hitting a build error with allnoconfig:
> > > > >
> > > > > In file included from mm/shmem.c:44:
> > > > > mm/swap.h: In function ‘folio_index’:
> > > > > mm/swap.h:462:24: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > > > ‘swp_offset’; did you mean ‘pmd_offset’?
> > > > > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > > > > 462 | return swp_offset(folio->swap);
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks like a header might be missing in mm/swap.h. Please let me know
> > > > > if you need any more information.
> > > >
> > > > Confirmed that just adding #include <linux/swapops.h> into mm/swap.h fixes it.
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
> > > > index ad339547ee8c..271e8c560fcc 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/swap.h
> > > > +++ b/mm/swap.h
> > > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > > > #define _MM_SWAP_H
> > > >
> > > > #include <linux/atomic.h> /* for atomic_long_t */
> > > > +#include <linux/swapops.h>
> > > > struct mempolicy;
> > > > struct swap_iocb;
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Lance
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Lance,
> > >
> > > You are testing V2 not V3 right? The build error is in V2 and I can
> > > confirm that. But In V3 I've added "ifdef CONFIG_SWAP" for the
> > > swp_offset usage in swap.h. I've just tested allnoconfig and it
> > > works fine on aarch64 and x86_64.
> > >
> > > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250905191357.78298-12-ryncsn@gmail.com/
> >
> >
> > Ah, I was testing V2. My apologies for the noise!
> >
>
> OK so my bug is different then :)
>
> I think the issue is that you're not properly checking for:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> ...
> #endif
>
> This is v3 (I see the #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP) btw.
>
> So swapops.h is wrapped by #ifdef CONFIG_MMU which is why the declaration is
> missing.
>
> The below fixpatch fixes things for me.
>
> Cheers, Lorenzo
>
> ----8<----
> From 5a3969a438af9c33422a45fe813a44068d784b2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 10:28:40 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h | 3 +++
> mm/swap.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> index b8000ce4b59f..b06f55915653 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> @@ -1050,6 +1050,9 @@ int page_in_phys_avail(unsigned long paddr);
>
> int remap_pfn_range(struct vm_area_struct *, unsigned long, unsigned long,
> unsigned long, pgprot_t);
> +void remap_pfn_range_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc, unsigned long pfn);
> +int remap_pfn_range_complete(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t pgprot);
>
> void adi_restore_tags(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, pte_t pte);
> diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
> index caff4fe30fc5..18651687fcd1 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.h
> +++ b/mm/swap.h
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ enum swap_cluster_flags {
> CLUSTER_FLAG_MAX,
> };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SWAP) && defined(CONFIG_MMU)
> #include <linux/swapops.h> /* for swp_offset */
> #include <linux/blk_types.h> /* for bio_end_io_t */
>
> @@ -317,7 +317,26 @@ static inline int non_swapcache_batch(swp_entry_t entry, int max_nr)
> return i;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * folio_index - File index of a folio.
> + * @folio: The folio.
> + *
> + * For a folio which is either in the page cache or the swap cache,
> + * return its index within the address_space it belongs to. If you know
> + * the folio is definitely in the page cache, you can look at the folio's
> + * index directly.
> + *
> + * Return: The index (offset in units of pages) of a folio in its file.
> + */
> +static inline pgoff_t folio_index(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + if (unlikely(folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
> + return swp_offset(folio->swap);
> + return folio->index;
> +}
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_SWAP */
> +
> struct swap_iocb;
> static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_lock(
> struct swap_info_struct *si, pgoff_t offset, bool irq)
> @@ -442,24 +461,12 @@ static inline int non_swapcache_batch(swp_entry_t entry, int max_nr)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SWAP */
>
> -/**
> - * folio_index - File index of a folio.
> - * @folio: The folio.
> - *
> - * For a folio which is either in the page cache or the swap cache,
> - * return its index within the address_space it belongs to. If you know
> - * the folio is definitely in the page cache, you can look at the folio's
> - * index directly.
> - *
> - * Return: The index (offset in units of pages) of a folio in its file.
> - */
> static inline pgoff_t folio_index(struct folio *folio)
> {
> - if (unlikely(folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
> - return swp_offset(folio->swap);
> return folio->index;
> }
>
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _MM_SWAP_H */
> --
> 2.51.0
Thanks for the info. But I think V3 should be good?
CONFIG_SWAP depends on CONFIG_MMU so if you have !CONFIG_MMU, you must
have !CONFIG_SWAP.
I didn't adjust the header in V3 and fixed it differently from what
Lance is suggesting, V3 wraps swp_offset with CONFIG_SWAP. It should
covers !CONFIG_MMU case too.
The folio_index in V3 (this patch) looks like this:
static inline pgoff_t folio_index(struct folio *folio)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
if (unlikely(folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
return swp_offset(folio->swap);
#endif
return folio->index;
}
I just tested !MMU and it seems fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists