lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mbs6h3gfntcyuumccrrup3ifb2dzmpsikvccu7ovrnsebuammy@if4p7zbtvees>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 13:40:30 +0200
From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <kernel@...kajraghav.com>
To: alexjlzheng@...il.com
Cc: hch@...radead.org, brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, 
	yi.zhang@...wei.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] allow partial folio write with iomap_folio_state

On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 11:37:14AM +0800, alexjlzheng@...il.com wrote:
> This patchset has been tested by xfstests' generic and xfs group, and
> there's no new failed cases compared to the lastest upstream version kernel.

Do you know if there is a specific test from generic/ or xfs/ in
xfstests that is testing this path?

As this is slightly changing the behaviour of a partial write, it would
be nice to either add a test or highlight which test is hitting this
path in the cover letter.

--
Pankaj

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ