linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] allow partial folio write with iomap_folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250914133007.3618448-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 21:30:07 +0800
From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...il.com>
To: kernel@...kajraghav.com
Cc: alexjlzheng@...il.com,
	alexjlzheng@...cent.com,
	brauner@...nel.org,
	djwong@...nel.org,
	hch@...radead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
	yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] allow partial folio write with iomap_folio_state

On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 13:40:30 +0200, kernel@...kajraghav.com wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2025 at 11:37:14AM +0800, alexjlzheng@...il.com wrote:
> > This patchset has been tested by xfstests' generic and xfs group, and
> > there's no new failed cases compared to the lastest upstream version kernel.
> 
> Do you know if there is a specific test from generic/ or xfs/ in
> xfstests that is testing this path?

It seems not. But there is a chance that the existing buffer write will hit.

thanks,
Jinliang Zheng. :)

> 
> As this is slightly changing the behaviour of a partial write, it would
> be nice to either add a test or highlight which test is hitting this
> path in the cover letter.
> 
> --
> Pankaj