[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5214509d-a2e6-4e55-823b-49f2dbfb5971@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 10:03:50 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Taimoor Zaeem <taimoorzaeem@...il.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: staging: fix spelling error in
remoteproc.rst
Hi--
On 9/14/25 4:46 AM, Taimoor Zaeem wrote:
>
(pasting email from
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/CANQcFN1s_iM8p5tYNz3Q_WyZki6Aw9_3HyoKwyoCVA9JeqG0eA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
)
>From 10321c75f8fc1296775942f13cb3af78fdc8dcc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Taimoor Zaeem <taimoorzaeem@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 16:31:56 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: staging: fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst
Fix typo 'implementors' to 'implementers' in remote processor framework
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Taimoor Zaeem <taimoorzaeem@...il.com>
---
Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
index 348ee7e508ac..5c226fa076d6 100644
--- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Typical usage
rproc_shutdown(my_rproc);
}
-API for implementors
+API for implementers
====================
::
--
2.51.0
----------------- end of copy/paste --------------------
How do you know that's a typo?
Did you check on the internet to see if both spellings
are acceptable?
thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists