[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3ee891f-a025-4a71-8e7c-af5b52a8484f@arm.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 12:56:13 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/khugepaged: Do not fail collapse_pte_mapped_thp() on
SCAN_PMD_NULL
On 12/09/25 10:28 pm, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>
>
> MADV_COLLAPSE on a file mapping behaves inconsistently depending on if
> PMD page table is installed or not.
>
> Consider following example:
>
> p = mmap(NULL, 2UL << 20, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> err = madvise(p, 2UL << 20, MADV_COLLAPSE);
>
> fd is a populated tmpfs file.
>
> The result depends on the address that the kernel returns on mmap().
> If it is located in an existing PMD table, the madvise() will succeed.
> However, if the table does not exist, it will fail with -EINVAL.
>
> This occurs because find_pmd_or_thp_or_none() returns SCAN_PMD_NULL when
> a page table is missing, which causes collapse_pte_mapped_thp() to fail.
>
> SCAN_PMD_NULL and SCAN_PMD_NONE should be treated the same in
> collapse_pte_mapped_thp(): install the PMD leaf entry and allocate page
> tables as needed.
Thanks.
Besides this patch, the label maybe_install_pmd is misleading -
SCAN_PMD_NONE means that the pmd table exists, just that the pmd
entry is none, so the pmd is already installed. Along with this,
the argument bool install_pmd should likewise be install_huge_pmd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>
> ---
> mm/khugepaged.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index b486c1d19b2d..9e76a4f46df9 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1488,6 +1488,28 @@ static int set_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> return SCAN_SUCCEED;
> }
>
> +static int install_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long haddr,
> + pmd_t *pmd, struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> + pgd_t *pgd;
> + p4d_t *p4d;
> + pud_t *pud;
> +
> + pgd = pgd_offset(mm, haddr);
> + p4d = p4d_alloc(mm, pgd, haddr);
> + if (!p4d)
> + return SCAN_FAIL;
> + pud = pud_alloc(mm, p4d, haddr);
> + if (!pud)
> + return SCAN_FAIL;
> + pmd = pmd_alloc(mm, pud, haddr);
> + if (!pmd)
> + return SCAN_FAIL;
> +
> + return set_huge_pmd(vma, haddr, pmd, folio, &folio->page);
> +}
> +
For the SCAN_PMD_NONE case, we are unconditionally traversing the pagetables
now which is not needed. How about, in set_huge_pmd(), we pass a boolean install_pmd,
and at the start of the function, call install_pmd() which will do the traversal
and the pmd_alloc()? That will also make it crystal clear that in the SCAN_PMD_NULL
case, we are first installing the PMD table and then setting it to huge. Right now
the distinction between the two cases is not clear.
> /**
> * collapse_pte_mapped_thp - Try to collapse a pte-mapped THP for mm at
> * address haddr.
> @@ -1556,6 +1578,7 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> switch (result) {
> case SCAN_SUCCEED:
> break;
> + case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
> case SCAN_PMD_NONE:
> /*
> * All pte entries have been removed and pmd cleared.
> @@ -1700,7 +1723,7 @@ int collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> maybe_install_pmd:
> /* step 5: install pmd entry */
> result = install_pmd
> - ? set_huge_pmd(vma, haddr, pmd, folio, &folio->page)
> + ? install_huge_pmd(vma, haddr, pmd, folio)
> : SCAN_SUCCEED;
> goto drop_folio;
> abort:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists