[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMgGuDxzYZpw9sti@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:29:44 -0400
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] clk: Add KUnit tests for assigned-clock-sscs
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 04:29:38PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Spread spectrum configuration is part of clock frequency settings,
> and its behavior can be validated similarly to assigned clock rates.
>
> Extend the existing KUnit tests for assigned-clock-rates to cover
> assigned-clock-sscs by reusing the test framework. Add new test
> device trees:
> - kunit_clk_assigned_sscs_null.dtso
> - kunit_clk_assigned_sscs_null_consumer.dtso
> - kunit_clk_assigned_sscs_without.dtso
> - kunit_clk_assigned_sscs_without_consumer.dtso
> - kunit_clk_assigned_sscs_zero.dtso
> - kunit_clk_assigned_sscs_zero_consumer.dtso
>
> These tests cover various invalid configurations of assigned-clock-sscs,
> ensuring robustness and consistent error handling, similar to the coverage
> provided for assigned-clock-rates.
>
> Co-developed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
This looks good to me. I'd typically leave a Reviewed-by, but that's
probably not appropriate since I'm already listed with a
Co-developed-by.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists