linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftest/futex: Make the error check more precise for futex_numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57ac07c0-d4a8-4839-8454-de19fdf2f3a4@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 09:58:11 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
 Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, kernel-dev@...lia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftest/futex: Make the error check more precise
 for futex_numa_mpol

Hi Sebastian,

Em 15/09/2025 04:51, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior escreveu:
> On 2025-09-04 13:55:55 [-0300], André Almeida wrote:
>> Instead of just checking if the syscall failed as expected, check as
>> well what is the error code returned, to check if it's match the
>> expectation and it's failing in the correct error path inside the
>> kernel.
> 
> André, these two are the only ones that are still pending?
> 

For now, yes. I have more selftests cleanups that I would like to send, 
but they will be done on top of those two, so I would prefer to get 
those queued first.

Thanks!