lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250915042112.GB1331@nxa18884-linux.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:21:12 +0800
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Alexandru Chimac <alex@...mac.ro>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Alexandru Chimac <alexchimac@...tonmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for pll_1061x

On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 09:19:32PM +0000, Alexandru Chimac wrote:
>These PLLs are found in the Exynos9610 and Exynos9810 SoCs, and
>are similar to pll_1460x, so the code for that can handle this
>PLL with a few small adaptations.
>
>Signed-off-by: Alexandru Chimac <alex@...mac.ro>
>---
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h |  1 +
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
>index 7bea7be1d7e45c32f0b303ffa55ce9cde4a4f71d..5fa553eab8e4b53a8854848737f619ef6a9c645a 100644
>--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
>+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
>@@ -785,15 +785,20 @@ static unsigned long samsung_pll46xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> 	u64 fvco = parent_rate;
> 
> 	pll_con0 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg);
>-	pll_con1 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg + 4);
>-	mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT) & ((pll->type == pll_1460x) ?
>+	if (pll->type == pll_1061x)
>+		pll_con1 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg + 12);
>+	else
>+		pll_con1 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg + 4);

Nit: it would be better to use hex value for the two magic numbers.

>+	mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL46XX_MDIV_SHIFT) & (((pll->type == pll_1460x)
>+				|| (pll->type == pll_1061x)) ?
> 				PLL1460X_MDIV_MASK : PLL46XX_MDIV_MASK);

FIELD_GET is preferred. But to align the coding style, it should be fine.

Regards
Peng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ