lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025091522-banjo-waggle-ccfe@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:52:35 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: cve@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-53212: xenbus: check xen_domain in xenbus_probe_initcall

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 04:38:05PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 15.09.25 16:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Description
> > ===========
> > 
> > In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
> > 
> > xenbus: check xen_domain in xenbus_probe_initcall
> > 
> > The same way we already do in xenbus_init.
> > Fixes the following warning:
> > 
> > [  352.175563] Trying to free already-free IRQ 0
> > [  352.177355] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 88 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1893 free_irq+0xbf/0x350
> > [...]
> > [  352.213951] Call Trace:
> > [  352.214390]  <TASK>
> > [  352.214717]  ? __warn+0x81/0x170
> > [  352.215436]  ? free_irq+0xbf/0x350
> > [  352.215906]  ? report_bug+0x10b/0x200
> > [  352.216408]  ? prb_read_valid+0x17/0x20
> > [  352.216926]  ? handle_bug+0x44/0x80
> > [  352.217409]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60
> > [  352.217932]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
> > [  352.218497]  ? free_irq+0xbf/0x350
> > [  352.218979]  ? __pfx_xenbus_probe_thread+0x10/0x10
> > [  352.219600]  xenbus_probe+0x7a/0x80
> > [  352.221030]  xenbus_probe_thread+0x76/0xc0
> > 
> > The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2023-53212 to this issue.
> 
> I don't see how an unprivileged user could trigger this problem.
> 
> Please revoke this CVE.

Now rejected, thanks for the review!

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ