linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] block/mq-deadline: Replace DD_PRIO_MAX with DD_PRIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41ff57c2-19d4-495b-ae51-f30e555a74b4@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:59:32 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@...il.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 chengkaitao <chengkaitao@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] block/mq-deadline: Replace DD_PRIO_MAX with
 DD_PRIO_COUNT

On 9/15/25 6:06 AM, chengkaitao wrote:
> Remove redundant DD_PRIO_MAX and enum types, Move DD_PRIO_COUNT
> into enum dd_prio{}, and similarly for DD_DIR_COUNT.

Why has this patch been reposted? Last time it was posted I explained in
detail that in my opinion all changes in this patch makes the code worse
instead of better. Additionally, when a new version of a patch is
posted, it should include a changelog. I don't see a changelog in this 
patch. Please drop this patch.

Bart.