linux-kernel - Re: Missing signoff in the capabilities-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aMhIkinrQtnFz1/c@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:10:42 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@...glemail.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <sergeh@...nel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Missing signoff in the capabilities-next tree

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 05:04:40PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Commit
> 
>   d87d3c530e0ce ("pid: use ns_capable_noaudit() when determining net sysctl permissions")
> 
> in the capabilites-next tree is missing a Signed-off-by from its
> committer.

Hm, I had expected b4 shazam to do that for me, but I see that
that requires -s.

In any case, I think I will be dropping it from this tree, and
Christian will take it through his.

thanks,
-serge