lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ewypjj64siaswcfvfzgxihwrflb6k6pz2mrfuu4ursdldwnqlm@ignlhd73keck>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:24:10 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, 
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, 
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, 
	Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>, 
	amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, 
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, 
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, 
	?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20Hellstr=C3=B6m?= <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, "Michael J . Ruhl" <mjruhl@...ana.ai>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/i915/gt: Use pci_rebar_size_supported()

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 03:42:23PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > PCI core provides pci_rebar_size_supported() that helps in checking if
> > a BAR Size is supported for the BAR or not. Use it in
> > i915_resize_lmem_bar() to simplify code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
> 
> and
> 
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>

Just for some random noise on commit log's bureaucracy: why do we
need both Ack and R-b? I think R-b covers Ack making it
redundant. Right?

Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ