[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6d81bac-8540-493d-8edd-18f5d52cf7ff@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:56:20 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...ecurity.net>,
John Allen <john.allen@....com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 25/41] KVM: x86: SVM: Emulate reads and writes to
shadow stack MSRs
On 9/12/2025 4:23 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> From: John Allen <john.allen@....com>
>
> Emulate shadow stack MSR access by reading and writing to the
> corresponding fields in the VMCB.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Allen <john.allen@....com>
> [sean: mark VMCB_CET dirty/clean as appropriate]
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
For the shortlog, shouldn't we use "KVM: SVM:"?
I don't see any change to common x86 code in this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists