[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250915182105.6664-1-gunnarku@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 18:20:44 +0000
From: Gunnar Kudrjavets <gunnarku@...zon.com>
To: <peterhuewe@....de>, <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC: <jgg@...pe.ca>, <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<christophe.ricard@...il.com>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Justinien Bouron <jbouron@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Fix incorrect arguments in tpm_tis_probe_irq_single
The tpm_tis_write8() call specifies arguments in wrong order. Should be
(data, addr, value) not (data, value, addr). The initial correct order
was changed during the major refactoring when the code was split.
Fixes: 41a5e1cf1fe1 ("tpm/tpm_tis: Split tpm_tis driver into a core and TCG TIS compliant phy")
Signed-off-by: Gunnar Kudrjavets <gunnarku@...zon.com>
Reviewed-by: Justinien Bouron <jbouron@...zon.com>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index 4b12c4b9da8b..8954a8660ffc 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 intmask,
* will call disable_irq which undoes all of the above.
*/
if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ)) {
- tpm_tis_write8(priv, original_int_vec,
- TPM_INT_VECTOR(priv->locality));
+ tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_INT_VECTOR(priv->locality),
+ original_int_vec);
rc = -1;
}
base-commit: f83ec76bf285bea5727f478a68b894f5543ca76e
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists