lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250915183725.219473-6-jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:37:23 +0200
From: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] spi: don't check spi_controller::num_chipselect when parsing a dt device

Do not validate spi_controller::num_chipselect against SPI_CS_CNT_MAX
when parsing an spi device firmware node.

Firstly this is the wrong place, and this should be done while
registering/validating the controller. Secondly, there is no reason for
that check, as SPI_CS_CNT_MAX controls the amount of chipselects a
device may have, not a controller may have.

So drop that check as it needlessly limits controllers to SPI_CS_CNT_MAX
number of chipselects.

Likewise, drop the check for number of device chipselects larger than
controller's number of chipselects, as __spi_add_device() will already
catch that as either one of the chip selects will be out of range, or
there is a duplicate one.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
* no changes

 drivers/spi/spi.c | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 91e2f4f504e8..2eb361e9e44d 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -2427,11 +2427,6 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (ctlr->num_chipselect > SPI_CS_CNT_MAX) {
-		dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "No. of CS is more than max. no. of supported CS\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* Device address */
 	rc = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(nc, "reg", &cs[0], 1,
 						 SPI_CS_CNT_MAX);
@@ -2440,11 +2435,7 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
 			nc, rc);
 		return rc;
 	}
-	if (rc > ctlr->num_chipselect) {
-		dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "%pOF has number of CS > ctlr->num_chipselect (%d)\n",
-			nc, rc);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
+
 	if ((of_property_present(nc, "parallel-memories")) &&
 	    (!(ctlr->flags & SPI_CONTROLLER_MULTI_CS))) {
 		dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "SPI controller doesn't support multi CS\n");
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ