linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: maintainer: Fix capitalization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c85881bd-a159-4bb3-9615-b87ce4ab0575@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:29:10 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: maintainer: Fix capitalization

Hi,

On 9/15/25 12:22 PM, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> The sentence starts at the previous line: s/Indicate/indicate/

Are you sure?
ISTM that the entire line is a "sub-heading".

> 
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
> ---
>  Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> index cda5d691e967..f411a0d10fad 100644
> --- a/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ wait for the next -rc. At a minimum:
>    submissions should appear before -rc5.
>  
>  - Last -rc to merge features: Deadline for merge decisions
> -  Indicate to contributors the point at which an as yet un-applied patch
> +  indicate to contributors the point at which an as yet un-applied patch
>    set will need to wait for the NEXT+1 merge window. Of course there is no
>    obligation to ever accept any given patchset, but if the review has not
>    concluded by this point the expectation is the contributor should wait and

-- 
~Randy