linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Fix incorrect arguments in tpm_tis_probe_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F9EAF351-3FFD-497F-952E-D6309B3819B4@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:49:50 +0000
From: "Kudrjavets, Gunnar" <gunnarku@...zon.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC: "peterhuewe@....de" <peterhuewe@....de>, "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
	"stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"christophe.ricard@...il.com" <christophe.ricard@...il.com>,
	"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Bouron,
 Justinien" <jbouron@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Fix incorrect arguments in
 tpm_tis_probe_irq_single

On 9/15/25, 11:43, "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org <mailto:jarkko@...nel.org>> wrote:

> Amazing catch, thank you. Have you been able to verify this?

The patch was tested in a custom test environment specifically
constructed for this case. However, this test suite does not *fully*
exercise the IRQ handling in this driver.

We figured it was worth proposing this patch even given these
limitations.

Regards,
Gunnar