[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fa9b725-5490-4ab2-ba0c-9923bd30c677@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 11:23:26 +0530
From: Tessolve Upstream <tessolveupstream@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, konradybcio@...nel.org
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tingweiz@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: add bindings for QCS615 talos
evk board
On 09/09/25 19:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/09/2025 14:52, Sudarshan Shetty wrote:
>> This adds binding support for the QCS615-based talos evk SMARC platform.
>
> Please do not use "This commit/patch/change", but imperative mood. See
> longer explanation here:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L94
>
> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
> See also:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.17-rc3/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>
> So simple patch and so many trivial mistakes which are already covered
> in documentation. Did you read the docs?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Shetty <tessolveupstream@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>> index 03a7d3c92ecd..a5dbe6af68ac 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>> @@ -952,6 +952,12 @@ properties:
>> - const: qcom,qcs615
>> - const: qcom,sm6150
>>
>> + - items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - qcom,qcs615-iq-615-evk
>
> That's enum with previous entry.
Ack, I’ll fix the commit message style, drop the redundant "bindings"
from the subject, and correct the enum placement in v2.
Thanks for pointing it out.
>
>> + - const: qcom,qcs615
>> + - const: qcom,sm6150
>> +
>> - items:
>> - enum:
>> - qcom,sa8155p-adp
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists