[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bb0cbd0-d3b2-4359-a2d0-6b757f66d0e0@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 14:26:12 +0800
From: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar
<abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fange.zhang@....qualcomm.com, yongxing.mou@....qualcomm.com,
li.liu@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display/msm: dp-controller: Add SM6150
On 9/12/2025 8:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:54:31PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
>> On 9/12/2025 7:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 07:39:16PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
>>>> Add DisplayPort controller for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC.
>>>> SM6150 shares the same configuration as SM8350, its hardware capabilities
>>>> differ about HBR3. Explicitly listing it ensures clarity and avoids
>>>> potential issues if SM8350 support evolves in the future.
>>> The controller is exactly the same as the one present on SM8150. HBR3 is
>>> a property of the PHY.
>>
>> Ok, will update commit msg.
> Please red my response again. What does it says to you wrt bindings?
>
Yes, SM6150 uses the same DisplayPort controller IP as SM8150. I wasn’t
previously familiar with how fallback compatibility is defined in the
bindings. Since SM6150 will be declared as a fallback to sm8350-dp, is it
fine to drop the driver patch ([2/2])?
Here’s the updated commit message for [1/2], does it match your expectation?
'SM6150 uses the same controller IP as SM8150. Declare SM6150 as a fallback
compatible to sm8350-dp for consistency with existing bindings and to ensure
correct matching and future clarity.'
Thanks again for your guidance.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists