[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250915064610.GB476609@black.igk.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:46:10 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@...adeus.com>,
Mika Westerberg <westeri@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: initialize acpi_gpio_info struct
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 09:30:46AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 06:47:03AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> > > Since commit 7c010d463372 ("gpiolib: acpi: Make sure we fill struct
> > > acpi_gpio_info"), uninitialized acpi_gpio_info struct are passed to
> > > __acpi_find_gpio() and later in the call stack info->quirks is used in
> > > acpi_populate_gpio_lookup. This breaks the i2c_hid_cpi driver:
> > >
> > > [ 58.122916] i2c_hid_acpi i2c-UNIW0001:00: HID over i2c has not been provided an Int IRQ
> > > [ 58.123097] i2c_hid_acpi i2c-UNIW0001:00: probe with driver i2c_hid_acpi failed with error -22
> > >
> > > Fix this by initializing the acpi_gpio_info pass to __acpi_find_gpio()
> > >
> > > Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220388
> > > Fixes: 7c010d463372 ("gpiolib: acpi: Make sure we fill struct acpi_gpio_info")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@...adeus.com>
> >
> > Should have stable tag too, I think. Andy can add that once he applies.
>
> I can add, but this won't appear in the respective mailing list. Or did I miss
> a new tag for stable?
It does not need to go to the mailing list. It's enough that it is
mentioned in the commit. E.g
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
And the stable "machinery" will notice it once it hits the mainline.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists