lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250915112834.1d566970@endymion>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 11:28:34 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Akshay Gupta <akshay.gupta@....com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
 <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Target architecture of amd-sbi driver

Hi Akshay,

The amd-sbi Linux driver (sbrmi-i2c kernel module) can currently be
selected on all architectures. Is this driver intended to be used on
the host, or on the BMC, or both?

If it's an host-side driver, it should not be proposed on non-x86
architectures by default and we should add a hardware dependency to it
(or'd with COMPILE_TEST to preserve build testing coverage). What do
you think?

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ